CANONS OF TAXATION
To begin with, we shall
elaborate on Adam smith’s canons which are still used as the foundation of
discussion on the principles of taxation. His canons are four altogether and
the remaining five have been developed with the passage of time.
1.
CANON
OF EQUALITY: The
word equality here does not mean that everyone should pay the equal amount of
tax. That would be unjust generally it would benefit the economy if all the
inhabitants could pay taxes i.e. apart from the indirect taxes. However, this
is not possible as everybody does not fall within the tax-payers category. What
equality reality means is that sacrifice of energy body has got to be equal so
that the rich pay more and the poor pay less. The amount of tax paid has to be
in proportion to the abilities of the tax payers.
2.
CANON
OF CERTAINTY: Tax-payers ought to be aware of the
purpose, amount and manner of payment. They should not be misled by
tax-collectors as this would lead to aggravation and arbitrariness. Everything
should be made clear and simple for the benefit of the tax payer. Uncertainty
leads to corruption. Hence, publicity is usually given to budget proposals for discussion
as well as criticism. Certainly the government wants to be accurate so that
estimates of taxes to be levied and expected return is properly calculated.
3.
CANON
OF CONVENIENCE: In the canon of certainty we maintained
that there ought to be certainty in the time and manner of payment. However in
this canon we say that both-element i.e. time and manner of payment must be
convenient for the tax-payer so that he is able to pay his taxes in the time
e.g. if farmers were to pay taxes on their crops before they were harvested,
naturally they would not be able to do so. Consumers find it convenient in
paying their taxes as such taxes are already included in the prices of the
commodity and unless they are purchased they would not have to pay the tax.
4.
CANON
OF ECONOMY: What
this canon means is that tax would be economical if the cost of collecting it
is very small. The whole amount taken out of people pockets should go directly
to the Treasury. There should not be any leakage in the way i.e. to say any
form of corruption. This canon also means to say that the expenditure on tax
collecting should be kept as low as possible and maximize the tax return. In
another sense a tax would be economical if it does not hamper the economic
progress.
The following
canons of taxation have come into existence with the passage of time through
modern economists.
5.
CANON
OF PRODUCTIVITY: This
canon means that production should be encouraged rather than otherwise. The
productive capacity of the community should not be crippled or impaired. The
government should avoid running into a deficit whenever possible. However, as
we mentioned in an earlier chapter, deficit budgeting is not a bad phenomenon,
it merely reflects that the government is in debt. Through canon of
productivity it is better to have fewer taxes with large revenue rather than
more taxes with less revenue.
6.
CANAN
OF ELASTICITY:
This would depend upon the state of affairs prevailing in a country. “As
a country’s needs arise, likewise revenue should also be increased otherwise it
(i.e. revenue) will be inadequate, e.g. during the phase of war. Government
expenditure must be-increased and likewise its revenue. That is why during war
periods countries tend to suffer. A classic example of classic tax is income
tax. Raising the rate up to small extent yields greater revenue.
7.
CANON
OF SIMLICITY: This canon emphasizes that method of
taxation should be made a simple procedure for the laymen to understand. It
should be plain, non-technical and straightforward’. This will allow the layman
to understand why he is paying tax. More important is that simplicity will
avoid corruption which would take place if procedures were complicated. The
amount and the purpose of taxation should be made clear.
8.
CANON
OF DIVERSITY: According to this canon, taxation
should be broad based i.e. to say there should be taxes of all kinds so that
the whole community shares the burden. There should be variety of direct and
indirect rates (for at least all those who are able to pay).
0 comments:
Post a Comment